The Case For Sexism:

Women, Water and Civilization (The WQ part 1)

This is Part One of the Futurist Right’s Woman Question Series.

Part Two, Tentative Title: “Kaschuta’s Lament”, Tacitus and Why Euros must not become Bug-men” will describe the eugenic case for limiting Sexism.

I’ve found some articles are best inspired by the right set of quotes. One insane, the other inspirational. Both by pretty good writers.

“Pro-progress will win when it wins women”, “Pro-progress should not become the Goon Cave” (Pro-progress is Teslo’s label for anti-safetyist, free-market and low regulation policy) —

Ruxandra Teslo

“Misogynists can write about why we need to repeal women’s right to vote as if it’s a live issue because it actually is way closer to being a live issue than the reverse.” —

Regan Arntz-Gray

The Case for Sexism flows naturally from the answers to the following questions:

• Why are women so dramatically underrepresented as titans of industry or as innovative scientists?

• Why are women so unappreciative of capitalism, nuclear power, and free speech?

We can find the answer to these questions through a simple task.

Attempt it now.

You might feel this task was almost too easy.

And you’d be right.

It was after all designed for measuring the development of children.

Yet not all children grow up.

— Roughly 40% of college women fail this water-level task, compared to 15% of college men. -

This finding, replicated over and over again since the 1970s; corresponds with the well measured roughly a half a standard deviation gap between men and women on spatial reasoning tasks.

Halpern, Diane F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.)

---

If you want to up the stakes with an increased number of tasks and use male and female liberal arts students you get an even more impressive result.

96% percent of female lib-arts students failed this test compared to 48% of male lib-arts students.