I am a hard sexist. I am engaged to be wed to a woman of no small accomplishment in her field as a medical doctor. She has no place in politics, nor does any other woman. When I attend my the male-only debate club in the major metropolitan area in which I live, women are in attendance but do not contribute. They cannot contribute to the debates in a meaningful way (not just because they aren't allowed to) but they are there. Some are there as partners to the members but many of them are young, attractive professional women looking for a high-value partner.
Hard sexism is not dysgenic, it is a prerequisite for proper male hierarchies to allow the most eugenic men to rise to the top. Wherever powerful men congregate, attractive women will not be far behind to try to peel off the top. Allowing them to partake in any male activity destroys the hierarchy and prevents this from occurring.
That's really interesting. Do you think the presence of women in the audience influences the course of the debates? For example, would the men be more or less competitive if the women weren't there at all?
Damn. This is brilliant. I'm currently trying to crack the code of 'women' right now. So far, I have deduced that it's important to become taller...
I have been proceeding through the list of cultural ideas about sex and womanhood and am quickly coming to the astonishing realization that they're nearly all incorrect, or rather anti-correct. They are the opposite of reality, almost as if someone designed them for some deeper, hidden purpose.
Yes, these ideas that fall neatly under the umbrella of Cultural Marxism, even though in case of feminism they are older, are used to break down gentile society by Jews.
Everything is filtered through the lense of oppresser-oppressed, nothing is allowed to be viewed outside of this dynamic and Jews are always the biggest victims. And the more perceived victims there are the better in order to wear down the power structures of host nations.
I've actually seen the following phenomenon before, though not in hard sexist groups (which I don't frequent).
"Your “friendship” group would actually just clap at everything you did, tell you that every romantic partner you expressed a doubt about wasn’t really good enough for you (even if they knew it was, or better). Tell you that you were always right in every conflict, every struggle, every decision you ever made. Even if anyone could tell, from the briefest observation that you were destroying your life."
Any such woman actually reading this already knows this and is happily married to a very lucky guy.
(Or is gay and married to a similar woman.)
I am a hard sexist. I am engaged to be wed to a woman of no small accomplishment in her field as a medical doctor. She has no place in politics, nor does any other woman. When I attend my the male-only debate club in the major metropolitan area in which I live, women are in attendance but do not contribute. They cannot contribute to the debates in a meaningful way (not just because they aren't allowed to) but they are there. Some are there as partners to the members but many of them are young, attractive professional women looking for a high-value partner.
Hard sexism is not dysgenic, it is a prerequisite for proper male hierarchies to allow the most eugenic men to rise to the top. Wherever powerful men congregate, attractive women will not be far behind to try to peel off the top. Allowing them to partake in any male activity destroys the hierarchy and prevents this from occurring.
That's really interesting. Do you think the presence of women in the audience influences the course of the debates? For example, would the men be more or less competitive if the women weren't there at all?
Is there a version of this in English? I don’t speak pompous bullshit…
Damn. This is brilliant. I'm currently trying to crack the code of 'women' right now. So far, I have deduced that it's important to become taller...
I have been proceeding through the list of cultural ideas about sex and womanhood and am quickly coming to the astonishing realization that they're nearly all incorrect, or rather anti-correct. They are the opposite of reality, almost as if someone designed them for some deeper, hidden purpose.
https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-of-female-power
Yes, these ideas that fall neatly under the umbrella of Cultural Marxism, even though in case of feminism they are older, are used to break down gentile society by Jews.
Everything is filtered through the lense of oppresser-oppressed, nothing is allowed to be viewed outside of this dynamic and Jews are always the biggest victims. And the more perceived victims there are the better in order to wear down the power structures of host nations.
They're a mirror. Chaos to order. If they're collectively messed up, we collectively messed up hard.
I've actually seen the following phenomenon before, though not in hard sexist groups (which I don't frequent).
"Your “friendship” group would actually just clap at everything you did, tell you that every romantic partner you expressed a doubt about wasn’t really good enough for you (even if they knew it was, or better). Tell you that you were always right in every conflict, every struggle, every decision you ever made. Even if anyone could tell, from the briefest observation that you were destroying your life."
Huh? Dude, you are guilty of way over-thinking everything. Too much.
Subject: Four Proposals to Heal the Nation, Women-Men issues addressed.
Please consider these 4 proposals to begin healing the Nation. They are detailed in my publish article:
Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2212:, 18th May 2025, Three Proposals to Heal the Nation - with the assistance of ChatGPT AI. Plus, another Proposal. https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2212
God Bless.,
Steven Work
--
PS. This different article's proposal suggests a paradigm-shift and might bring a better faster longer-lasting healing.
Multiverse Journal - Index Number 2211:, 16th May 2025, Proposal and Apologetic; I should be Accepted as world Pope-King, How and Why. Third version.
https://stevenwork.substack.com/p/multiverse-journal-index-number-2211
I need an explainer for this article. Usually, I feel pretty smart but when I read something like this I feel really stupid.