How you would judge that is "of those who do breed, how many kids do they have?" Do they have most people forming a family with only one child, continuing a slow societal decline? Or is there a vast majority of dysgenic people having zero children, with the occasional eugenic couple having 6 to 16 children?
sizable minority (of healthy, prosocial, wealthy) have 1-3 (the number correlates strongly with socioeconomic status and earning potential of the father)
a small minority of (usually older) men in the countryside import SEA wives and also have 1-2
then the immigration system is itself eugenic (no welfare tourism, hard to get residence, Korean language requirement functions as a +110-120 IQ test)
so there will be a genetic bottleneck in the Korean population, followed by long-term decline, buttressed by generally eugenic immigration, and a more racially-stratified society (pure Koreans and half-whites at the top and upper urban middle, half-SEA at the rural lower middle, Chinese Koreans at the bottom, plus guest workers filling roles automation cannot replace)
overall a positive benefit owing to the increased cognitive diversity that comes from hybridisation and multilingualism
unless, of course, they fuck it up by relaxing the language requirement for residence and import a horde of muslims (still possible)
Korean society is supremely eugenic
Also the children have wonderful childhoods until they turn 7 and the study begins
But the harsh reality of hagwons and military service weeds out the weak
While women with personality disorders remove themselves from the gene pool by refusing to breed
Only the strongest, healthiest men, and the most psychologically stable women actually have children
The future looks bright for the blood
How you would judge that is "of those who do breed, how many kids do they have?" Do they have most people forming a family with only one child, continuing a slow societal decline? Or is there a vast majority of dysgenic people having zero children, with the occasional eugenic couple having 6 to 16 children?
majority will have 0-1 children
sizable minority (of healthy, prosocial, wealthy) have 1-3 (the number correlates strongly with socioeconomic status and earning potential of the father)
a small minority of (usually older) men in the countryside import SEA wives and also have 1-2
then the immigration system is itself eugenic (no welfare tourism, hard to get residence, Korean language requirement functions as a +110-120 IQ test)
so there will be a genetic bottleneck in the Korean population, followed by long-term decline, buttressed by generally eugenic immigration, and a more racially-stratified society (pure Koreans and half-whites at the top and upper urban middle, half-SEA at the rural lower middle, Chinese Koreans at the bottom, plus guest workers filling roles automation cannot replace)
overall a positive benefit owing to the increased cognitive diversity that comes from hybridisation and multilingualism
unless, of course, they fuck it up by relaxing the language requirement for residence and import a horde of muslims (still possible)